← Back to Blog

What Is a 360 Deal — and Should Artists Sign One?

Every artist eventually hears the term "360 deal" across the negotiating table. It is one of the most debated contracts in modern music — praised by labels as a full partnership, and criticised by artists as a deal that takes a cut of everything. Here is what it really means, and how to decide if one is right for you.

What a 360 Deal Covers

A traditional record deal covers only recorded music: albums, singles, and the royalties they generate. A 360 deal expands that scope. Under a 360 deal, the label takes a percentage not just of recorded music, but of touring income, merchandise, endorsements and sponsorships, and often publishing as well. In exchange, the label puts real money behind the artist across every one of those channels, not just the record. Typical label cuts on these additional streams generally fall in the 10–30% range, depending on the revenue stream and the negotiation.

Why 360 Deals Exist

The model exists for a straightforward reason: record sales alone stopped covering the cost of developing an artist. Studio time, video budgets, marketing spend, and tour support all cost money, and a label fronting that investment wants a stake in the outcome across the artist's entire business. The 360 deal became the industry's default contract structure after streaming reduced what labels could earn from recordings alone. Labels needed new revenue sources; artists needed bigger marketing budgets.

When a 360 Deal Can Work

For an artist without existing infrastructure, the trade can be genuinely valuable. A well-structured 360 deal brings tour support, merchandise production, marketing muscle, and industry access that is difficult to build independently. Labels have every incentive to push an artist's career forward on every front once they have a percentage riding on all of it. The value increases when the label actively manages sponsorships, merchandise, and touring, rather than just claiming passive revenue shares.

The Risks to Watch

The danger is a label taking a cut of income it did nothing to generate. Watch for cross-collateralization, which allows labels to offset touring or merchandise income against unrecovered recording costs — significantly reducing an artist's take-home revenue. Before signing any 360 deal, negotiate revenue thresholds, audit rights, and carve-outs for publishing and merchandise. And always have a music or entertainment lawyer review the contract — labels expect negotiation, and the rights at stake are worth far more than the review costs. A 360 deal is not inherently good or bad. The math either works in your favour or it does not.

Keep 100% of your touring and merch — distribute with TIR →